Managing Patients With Sports Injuries Health And Social Care Essay

By in
No comments

Sport England ( 2009 ) estimated that 21 % of the grownup population in England on a regular basis participate in athletics with Nicholl et Al ( 1995 ) gauging 19.3 million new hurts a twelvemonth and 10.4 million reoccurrences of hurt. With recent enterprises such as ‘Change for Life ‘ and ‘Move for Health ‘ , promoting less sedentary life styles, there may be an associated addition in the figure of athleticss hurts experienced by the population. The figure of athleticss hurts a physical therapist sees may besides increase with the debut of self-referral strategies across the state. It should besides be noted that athleticss hurts can impact non merely elect jocks but anyone set abouting an activity, and the badness and hence effect of hurt can change greatly. Physiotherapy intercession of such hurts may hence be undertaken in a assortment of scenes from the NHS or private scenes to specialist club-based physical therapy.

Although much accent is placed upon physical facets of rehabilitation, the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy ( 2002 ) defines physical therapy as “ utilizing physical attacks to reconstruct physical, psychological and societal wellbeing ” . Arvinen-Barrow et Al ( 2010 ) suggest that “ for intervention to be effectual, physical therapists are required to turn to both physical and psychological facets of hurts ” . Management of a athleticss hurt is by and large thought of in footings of rehabilitation, which is defined as “ the Restoration of normal construction and map ” ( Crossman, 2001 ) . The writer believes that direction of a patient with a athleticss hurt should besides integrate the decrease of re-injury hazard to guarantee that the patient remains actively able to take part in their chosen activities.

To research the function of the physical therapist in use of psychological constructs in direction of patients with athleticss hurts, it is first necessary to understand psychological responses that may be experienced by the patient and psychological intercessions that may be utilised in their direction. This history will so discourse the function of the physical therapist in using these intercessions to the direction of patients with athleticss hurts.

Psychological Factors to See in Rehabilitation

Ahern and Lohr ( 1997 ) stated that psychological factors influence sensitivity to, the impact and continuance of an hurt. There have been a figure of surveies utilizing tools such as the Cattell 16PF ( Cattell, 1965 ) proposing that certain personality traits e.g. venue of control, aggressiveness, introversion-extroversion, self-concept, anxiousness and laterality ( Pease, 2004 ) predispose an person to injury. For illustration, an aggressive person may be more likely to take hazards and an dying individual may be easy distracted thereby increasing their hazard of hurt ( Ahern and Lohr, 1997 ) . Although this grounds has therefore far been inconclusive, these findings should be noted as a physical therapist may be good placed to place psychological factors that may impact rehabilitation. Williams and Anderson ( 1998 ) developed a theoretical account proposing interaction between psychological variables e.g. personality, get bying and stressors and hurt through a emphasis response which may besides do physiological alterations increasing the hazard of hurt. Whilst understanding precursors to injury may be cardinal in bar of reoccurrence, the physical therapists is ab initio likely to be involved in direction one time an hurt has occurred and so the psychological response to injury should be understood.

The heartache response theoretical account ( Kubler-Ross, 1969 ) has frequently been used to understand psychological responses to athleticss hurts proposing denial, choler, bargaining, depression and credence as phases in the recovery procedure due to a sense of loss. This theoretical account is non nevertheless, flexible plenty to turn to single differences when get bying with athleticss hurts ( Crossman, 2001 ) with a survey by Quinn and Fallon ( 1999 ) and Smith et Al ( 1990 ) saying injured jocks do non come on through a grief rhythm. Cognitive assessment theoretical accounts such as the Integrated Model of Psychological Response to the Sport Injury and Rehabilitation Process ( Wiese-Bjornstal et Al, 1998 ) have later been developed proposing an interaction of pre and post-injury variables on the results of recovery ( Kolt, 2003 ) , taking into history the state of affairs environing the hurt and the jocks ‘ feelings and engagement in the rehabilitation procedure. This theoretical account besides considers the impact of altering factors such as hurting position through rehabilitation ( Crossman, 2001 ) .

Depression, defeat, anxiousness, confusion, fright and choler are common responses to injury ( Kolt, 2003 ; Pease, 2004 ) . A figure of surveies have found that negative tempers are greatest in the early phases post-injury ( Dawes and Roach, 1997 ; Quinn and Fallon, 1999 ; Tracey, 2003 ) , although this can change throughout rehabilitation dependant on the patient ‘s experiences and personal features ( Arvinen-Barrow, 2007 ) . Factors that may impact recovery include temper, self-efficacy, motive and attachment, assurance and get bying accomplishments ( Quinn and Fallon, 1999 ) . It should besides be noted that come jocks may see an hurt as a positive event, leting them to re-evaluate their engagement in their athletics ( Pease, 2004 ) .

Given the physical therapists engagement in rehabilitation, they are potentially good placed to place and suitably pull off psychological cues at an early phase in rehabilitation. So what are the possible schemes a physical therapist could utilize when pull offing a patient with a athleticss hurt?

Physiotherapy usage of Psychological Concepts

Ahern and Lohr ( 1997 ) suggested that “ psychological schemes provide emphasis, anxiousness and arousal direction accomplishments to the jock for hurt bar and rehabilitation ” . There are a figure of schemes that will be considered here: end scene ; positive self-talk ; societal support ; and emphasize direction.

Goal scene is one of the most widely use psychological schemes by physical therapists working in this field and is normally accepted as a function that the physical therapist is able to set about by both physical therapists and jocks likewise. Short-run end scene was seen as an effectual technique by physical therapists but had variable positions from jocks ( Francis et al, 2000 ) with 75 % of physical therapists describing this as their most successful scheme ( Hemmings and Povey, 2002 ) . It was felt that physical therapists were knowing on realistic end scene ( Arvinen-Barrow et Al, 2010 ) and that this is a scheme they should hold cognition of ( Arvinen-Barrow et Al, 2007 ; Francis et Al, 2000 ) . However Arvinen-Barrow et Al ( 2010 ) found that while they were strong at puting physical recovery and public presentation ends, they lacked in footings of psychological end scene and collaborative end puting with the injured jock. Athletes felt that ends were set to unrealistic timeframes ( Francis et al, 2000 ) . There was besides limited information about long-run end scene. Communication with the jock during end scene may be of import in guaranting attachment to rehabilitation as improved cognition of hurt and rehabilitation can better the jock ‘s self-efficacy ( Christakou and Lavallee, 2009 ) . It is by and large accepted that end scene can hold a positive impact on physiological and psychological healing ( Arvinen-Barrow et Al, 2010 ) .

Positive self-talk was besides felt to be a utile psychological scheme, enabling the turning of negative ideas into positive 1s ( Ahern and Lohr, 1997 ) , therefore heightening athlete assurance and motive ( Arvinen-Barrow, 2010 ) and perchance forestalling negative ideas from maturating into more serious issues such as depression ( Pease, 2004 ) . Along with goal-setting, positive self-talk is one of the most utilized constructs by physical therapists in the direction of psychological issues during rehabilitation of injured jocks ( Arvinen-Barrow et Al, 2007 ) .

Social support refers to the web of people in topographic point to back up the injured jock and has been found to cut down emphasis and better attachment to rehabilitation ( Barcellona and Thomson, 2002 ) . Without a strong and appropriate support web, there may be increased hazard of negative emphasis predominating ( Pease, 2004 ) . This support can come from anyone in contact with the injured jock such as friends and household, different medical professionals or teammates or a manager. Peer modeling can besides be used if the patient is comfy with the agreements, as this gives them the chance to interact with another jock who has recovered from a similar hurt ( Weise and Weiss, 1987 ) . Arvinen-Barrow et Al ( 2010 ) reported that ‘being there ‘ can significantly impact recovery of the injured jock.

Stress direction techniques included mental imagination and relaxation exercisings such as deep external respiration and progressive musculus relaxation. These were thought by physical therapists and jocks likewise to be the least effectual techniques ( Francis et al, 2000 ) . Arvinen-Barrow et Al ( 2010 ) felt that these techniques were underutilised perchance because physical therapists were non familiar with their application and benefits, particularly if integrated with other intercessions such as end scene. Driediger ( 2008 ) successfully demonstrated the combination of imagination with end scene, pain direction and positive attitude. The Integrated Model of Psychological Response to the Sport Injury and Rehabilitation Process ( Wiese-Bjornstal et Al, 1998 ) as already discussed links emphasis to injury rehabilitation and forecast and so stress direction techniques may turn out utile in direction of athleticss hurts. However, do such techniques fall under the remit of the physical therapist?

Physiotherapist Role

As mentioned earlier, countrywide enterprises to increase activity degrees and the debut of self-referral strategies may take to an addition in the figure of patients with athleticss hurts necessitating physical therapy intercession. In 1997, Dawes and Roach reported 49 % of people with athleticss hurts seeking physical therapy intervention as their first port of call. This chance for early intercession topographic points physical therapists in a cardinal place in the patient ‘s attention tract, from where they may be able to place psychological factors that may impact rehabilitation and forecast ( Dawes and Roach, 1997 ) , and besides hazard of re-injury. However, Hemmings and Povey ( 2002 ) found that physical therapists felt that psychological intercession was non in their range to present.

Lafferty et Al ( 2008 ) found that there were differences across scenes that physical therapists were working in, with club-based physical therapists utilizing less psychological techniques than club-based physical therapists who concentrated on goal-setting. This difference may be due to more prevailing multi-disciplinary squad ( MDT ) working at professional degree ( Arvinen-Barrow, 2010 ) , with 69 % of physical therapists working in professional football nines holding entree to a athleticss psychologist compared to merely 25.3 % of UK physical therapists ( Heaney, 2006 ) . This disagreement may be due to tougher fiscal restraints within the national health care system compared with professional athleticss nines. Physical therapists working in the private or professional sector may besides experience that they are capable to much larger extrinsic force per unit areas from directors or managers to guarantee that the jock is physically fit to return to feature and so may be more likely to concentrate on physical rehabilitation to the hurt of psychological well-being.

As a general regulation, physical therapists have succumb to supplying psychological support during rehabilitation of patients with athleticss hurts ( Jevon and Johnston, 2003 ) , as they recognise the importance of a biopsychosocial attack. However many feel unable to efficaciously present these psychological intercessions ( Francis et al, 2000 ) This is partially due to big fluctuations and by and large minimum formal preparation. 87 % of physical therapists express a want for farther psychological preparation ( Gordon et al, 1991 ) which Francis et Al ( 2000 ) suggest is delivered by a qualified psychologist. Physical therapists may besides experience limited in the bringing of psychological intercessions due to increased clip force per unit areas when handling patients, particularly within the NHS where a physical therapist may merely hold 20 proceedingss in which to handle a patient ( Barcellona and Thomson, 2002 ) with larger spreads between intervention Sessionss than in a private or professional scene.

Another emerging subject across research is the necessity for physical therapists to be cognizant of their range of pattern and to be able to recognize state of affairss that require an onward referral to a more appropriate MDT member such as a qualified athleticss psychologist ( Arvinen-Barrow et Al, 2010 ; Harris, 2005 ) . The injured jock must besides comprehend any intercession to be within the range of a physical therapist in order for them to be successful as if the patient is non comfy, they may non take part as they would otherwise and recovery may be hindered.


“ There is a critical and of import function for the athleticss medical specialty practician in the psychological support provided to injured jocks. Whilst struggle exists sing the exact nature and deepness of this function, practicians are presuming duty for its proviso, even if non self-acknowledging this. ”

“ Psychological techniques can be used during rehabilitation to assist jocks cope with hurting and anxiousness, trade with negative and irrational thought, and to help with motive and conformity ” ( Crossman, 2001 )

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *